Showing posts with label Government Intervention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government Intervention. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 June 2014

Maximum Price and Minimum Price


GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN MARKET PRICES

Maximum Price or PRICE CEILINGS

In some markets, governments intervene to keep prices of certain items higher or lower than what would result from the market finding its own equilibrium price.
A price ceiling occurs when the government puts a legal limit on how high the price of a product can be. In order for a price ceiling to be effective, it must be set below the natural market equilibrium.
It is also known as maximum price.
Rent control is an example of a price ceiling, a maximum allowable price. With a price ceiling, the government forbids a price above the maximum. A price ceiling that is set below the equilibrium price creates a shortage that will persist.
price-control-1
For the price that the ceiling is set at, there is more demand (Q2) than there is at the equilibrium price. There is also less supply (Q1) than there is at the equilibrium price, thus there is more quantity demanded than quantity supplied i.e. shortage.

Impact of Price ceiling

Inefficiency: Inefficiency occurs since at the price ceiling quantity supplied the marginal benefit exceeds the marginal cost. This inefficiency is equal to the deadweight welfare loss.
Existence of black market: Due to demand exceeding the supply, there will be buyers who will be willing to purchase the good at a higher price. This will lead to existence of black market.

How can government correct this situation

Subsidies may be offered to the firms to encourage the production of such goods. However it involves an opportunity cost to the government as they might have to divert funds from other activities.
Government may also consider the option of producing the goods by themselves.
Government may also release previously stored inventory of such goods to ensure that there is no shortage in the market, however, it might not be possible for all the goods, for example, perishable goods.
All these options will lead to the shift of supply curve to the right and thus forming a new equilibrium at Pmax.
price-control-6

Minimum Prices or Price Floor

A minimum allowable price set above the equilibrium price is a price floor. With a price floor, the government forbids a price below the minimum price. Price Floors are minimum prices set by the government for certain commodities and services that it believes are being sold in an unfair market with too low of a price and thus their producers deserve some assistance.
price-control-2

Government might set Minimum prices

• To raise incomes for producers such a farmers and protect them from frequent fluctuations in the commodity market.
• To protect workers and ensure that they get enough wages to sustain a reasonable standard of living.

Examples of price floors

• In many countries governments assist farmers by setting price floors in agricultural markets.
• Setting Minimum wages for certain occupations is also an example of price floors.

Consequences of a price floor

As seen from the diagram. The equilibrium price for a particular good is Pe and the Quantity demanded is Qe.
price-control-7
The government thinks that it is too low for that good thus they set up a minimum price for a good Pmin.
This will lead to a fall in demand to Q1 and increase in supply to Q2, thus creating excess supply or surplus.
Government can eliminate the surplus by buying the excess supply at the minimum price. This will result in the shifting of demand curve to the right, thus creating a new equilibrium at Pmin.
The Government may store it or sell it abroad. However, both these options have consequences. Buying the surplus and storing it will cost an opportunity cost for the government as they have to divert funds from other important areas and exporting it other countries may be considered as dumping.

Thursday, 22 May 2014

Subsidies for Positive Externalities

Subsidies involves the government paying part of the cost to the firm. This reduces the price of the good and should encourage more consumption. A subsidy shifts the supply curve to the right.



What is Justification for Subsidising goods with positive externalities?
In a free market, people ignore the positive externalities of consumption, e.g. when cycling to work, you don’t consider the reduction in pollution your decision creates. In a free market, there is under consumption of good with positive externalities because people usually ignore the ‘external benefits’ their decisions make.
Examples of goods with positive externalities in societies
  • Health care – free universal health care can ensure everyone gets vaccinated; this prevents the spread of infectious disease, which benefits everyone. In other words, you have a personal benefit from other people being healthy.
  • Collecting refuse and litter – If litter is picked up it benefits everyone else who can enjoy a more beautiful environment. It also helps improve public health.
  • Education. If the long-term structurally unemployed workers gain useful training and education, it enables them to find work. This has benefits for other people in society -  The government receives more tax revenue and pays less unemployment benefit. There is also a less tangible benefit of a more cohesive society.
Diagram showing market failure when there is a positive externality
The free market equilibrium is at Q1. because S=D. People maximise their welfare where private marginal benefit = private marginal cost.
But, social efficiency occurs at Q2 (where SMB = SMC), therefore, at the free market equilibrium, the social marginal benefit is greater than the social marginal cost. Society would benefit from increasing output until Q2.
To increase consumption and production, the government can offer a subsidy to reduce the price and increase quantity.

Diagram of subsidy on positive externality

subsidy
  • Subsidy = P0 -P2
  • The supply curve shifts to S2 and price falls from P1 to P2
  • People will now consume more, the quantity increases from Q1 to Q2.
  • Q2 = Social Efficiency: because SMC = SMB

Advantages of Subsidies

  • Enables greater social efficiency. Consumers end up paying the socially efficient price which includes the external benefit.
  • If you subsidise public transport, it will encourage people to drive less, and reduce their negative externalities. In the long term, subsidies for a good will help change preferences. It will encourage firms to develop more products with positive externalities.

Potential problems of subsidies

  • The cost will have to be met through taxation. Some taxation, e.g. income tax, may reduce incentives to work. Though the most efficient way to raise revenue for subsidising positive externalities, would be to tax goods with negative externalities, e.g. tax cars driving in city centres (congestion charge) and use the money to pay for public transport.
  • Difficult to estimate the extent of the positive externality, therefore the government may have poor information about the service and how much to subsidise.
  • There is a danger that government subsidies may encourage firms to be inefficient and they come to rely on subsidy rather than improve efficiency.

Taxes on Negative Externalities

1. Taxes On Negative Externalities

 


tax

DISADVANTAGES of taxes

  • Difficult to measure the level of negative externality e.g. what is the cost of pollution from a car?
  • If Demand is inelastic then higher taxes will not reduce demand much
  • Taxes will cause inequality
  • Cost of administration
  • Possibility of evasion. E.g. with tax on disposing of rubbish there has been an increase in fly tipping (illegal Dumping of rubbish)
  • May be difficult to decide who is causing pollution

Advantages of Taxes

  • Provides incentives to reduce the negative externality such as pollution. E.g. cars have become more fuel efficient
  • Social efficiency, 1st best solution (where MSC = MSB)
  • Taxes raise revenue for the govt. This can be spent on alternatives.